|
BASAVESWARA SEVA SANGHA: A CASE STUDY OF SUSTAINING THE LLP BEYOND
THE STIPULATED IMPLEMENTATION PERIOD :
This sangha in Tattakarai
village provides an interesting and inspiring example of opportunities
afforded through the LLP in the post-programme period, made possible
because the sangha members had full freedom to manage their programme
their way. This sangha was formed on the motivation of MYRADA in 1988,
and has 15 members. When the LLP was discussed with them in 1990 the
sangha identified 6 of its members to receive the first year’s funding
of Rs.500/- each. Additional funds became available in the second year
due to migration of some families from one or two other sanghas. Hence,
in the second year not only did the first 6 receive their second
installment of Rs.500/- each but it also became possible to advance
Rs.500/- each to 8 more members. Only one sangha member decided not to
be involved in the programme as his job of doing coolie work for the
Forest Department left him with too little time for anything else. All
14 members chose to purchase sheep. Totally, the sangha absorbed
Rs.10,000/- towards the LLP. This amount has been fully repaid to the
group common fund. Four years later, the members are continuing with the
programme using this common fund as follows: Each January the members
look at the money available in the common fund
and make a decision of how much will be allotted for sheep rearing. They
divide the amount by the number of members interested in sheep rearing
that year, so each receives the same amount. Those who want to purchase
more sheep supplement the loan amount with their own resources; those
who wish to buy only one or two animals will use the balance amount to
take up other income generating activities of their choice. The sheep
are then bought and the members rear them for six months. They sell them
at a profit in June/July, when rains and cold weather start and
agricultural activities, as well as money for home improvements or
investment in other income generating activities. This pattern is being
followed each year. These farmers are not interested in building
up flocks of sheep as
earlier anticipated by MYRADA. Rather, they have worked out the timing
just right so that their animal husbandry and innovative management
system is of their own creation. The following table shows the income
generated over four years:
1990
– 1992
| Borrower |
LLP Amount
|
No. of
Sheep
|
Death of Sheep
|
Sales Returns
|
Profit |
Loan
Amount
Repaid
|
| Jawaraiyan |
1,000 |
4 |
- |
1,850 |
850 |
1,000 |
| Puttathambadi |
1,000 |
4 |
2 |
1,000 |
- |
1,000 |
| Gurusiddappa |
1,000 |
4 |
- |
2,000 |
1,000 |
1,000 |
| Siddappa |
1,000 |
4 |
- |
1,700 |
700 |
1,000 |
| Chinnabodagowda |
1,000 |
4 |
- |
1,800 |
800 |
1,000 |
| J.Puttappa |
1,000 |
4 |
1 |
1,650 |
650 |
1,000 |
| J.Rudrappa |
500 |
2 |
- |
1,000 |
500 |
500 |
| T.G.Nagaraja |
500 |
2 |
1 |
500 |
- |
500 |
| G.Murugan |
500 |
2 |
- |
1,000 |
500 |
500 |
| T.S.Moorthy |
500 |
2 |
- |
1,000 |
500 |
500 |
| T.E.Mathiyan |
500 |
2 |
- |
1,000 |
500 |
500 |
| T.E.Devaraju |
500 |
2 |
- |
950 |
450 |
500 |
| Puttappa |
500 |
2 |
- |
1,000 |
500 |
500 |
| Chinnappa |
500 |
2 |
- |
1,000 |
500 |
500 |
| TOTAL |
10,000 |
40 |
4 |
17,450 |
7,450 |
10,000 |
1993
| Borrower |
LLP Amount |
No. of Sheep
|
Total Cost
|
Sales Returns
|
Profit |
| Jawaraiyan |
500 |
4 |
970 |
2,020 |
1,050 |
| Puttathambadi |
|
|
|
|
|
| Gurusiddappa |
500 |
2 |
500 |
850 |
350 |
| Siddappa |
500 |
2 |
500 |
655 |
155 |
| Chinnabodagowda |
|
|
|
|
|
| J.Puttappa |
500 |
3 |
600 |
1200 |
600 |
| J.Rudrappa |
500 |
2 |
500 |
850 |
350 |
| T.G.Nagaraja |
|
|
|
|
|
| G.Murugan |
500 |
2 |
500 |
850 |
350 |
| T.S.Moorthy |
|
|
|
|
|
| T.E.Mathiyan |
500 |
2 |
500 |
860 |
360 |
| T.E.Devaraju |
500 |
2 |
500 |
900 |
400 |
| Puttappa |
500 |
2 |
500 |
950 |
450 |
| Chinnappa |
|
|
|
|
|
| TOTAL |
4,500 |
21 |
5,070 |
9,135 |
4,065 |
|