This was the first of several workshops planned for a group of staff
from 8 MYRADA Projects
(participant list attached) aimed at strengthening their professional
competence in carrying
out rural development programmes.
The workshop coincided with the Tenth Death Anniversary of Mr.William
Davinson, MYRADA's first Executive
Director. The focus was, appropriately enough, on building a Vision for MYRADA : an organisation nurtured by
Mr.Davinson from its inception in 1968 right upto his own
demise in September 1985 to give its creative best to the field of rural
development.
These workshop notes are not exhaustive, since the sessions relied
largely on lengthy discussions amongst
participants in small groups to address a series of issues. These notes
summarise the key points that emerged
over the period of two days.
Concepts :
PARADIGMS & PARADIGM SHIFTS :
Paradigms are cause - and - effect frameworks that condition our
perceptions, and consequently, our
actions when faced with typical situations.
Eg. Perception : Large
groups cause confusion in training programmes.
Action : Keep group size to less
than 25. Have more number of training
batches if the participants number more than 25.
Paradigms fix the boundaries within which we operate. Everyone of us is
consciously or unconsciously governed by
many paradigms in our everyday lives.
Paradigm shifts occur when existing paradigms are challenged (either by
choice or under pressure or, at times,
accidentally) such that we break away from the existing frameworks
and do something different.
Eg. By Choice (self-questioning) : "Is
it not possible to train large groups successfully? I’m
sure I can do it if I modify my training techniques."
Under Pressure : When 25 people
are invited for training and 40 people
show up whom we cannot send back. We are forced
to think of techniques that can handle the large group.
This then provides us a framework for similar situations
in future.
By Accident : "Instead of the
usual lecture, I used the ‘sangha’ film to
clarify SHG concepts. All 25 participants understood
the basic concepts well. Even if there had been
100 people they would have understood the concept.
Innovations result from paradigm shifts.
Eg. Paradigm : MYRADA has to support SHGs with working capital.
Paradigm
Shift : Banks can link up directly with SHGs
In our work, we have to constantly
question our paradigms in order to innovate and improve
our quality and range of services.
What is seemingly impossible through one paradigm becomes
surprisingly simple in another
paradigm.
In order to remain leaders in the field of rural development our
SUCCESS
CRITERIA and DEFINITION
OF 'GOOD" must change from time
to time.
|
The
responsibility of an innovator is not just to throw up good ideas - it is also the ability
to translate ideas into action successfully.
|
VERTICAL THINKING AND HORIZONTAL THINKING :
Vertical thinking is thinking that proceeds along one direction.
Horizontal thinking is thinking that
explores more than one direction. Vertical thinking produces expertise along a given area of thought; horizontal
thinking results in innovation from exploring several
trains of thoughts. DOING THE SAME
THINGS BETTER vs. FINDING A BETTER
THING TO DO : A combination of both
is the formula for success.
COMPLAINT ORIENTATION AND SOLUTION ORIENTATION :
This refers to people types. There are some people in every
organisation who complain all the time
about why things cannot get better. There are others who recognise problems
either within themselves or within the organisation but instead of
remaining content with merely complaining
they actively engage in finding solutions. The latter are
the people who contribute to success.
ACHIEVEMENT GRID
FOR ORGANISATIONS :
[This was not discussed at the workshop but can be appropriately
incorporated here.]

The workshop also discussed the following sets of questions in small
groups, that were later consolidated in
the plenary sessions leading to the formulation of a shared vision for
MYRADA by the year 2000 A.D.
First set of Questions :
¨ Why are new
ideas resisted?
¨ What may block our vision for the
future?
¨ What can create new paradigms?
¨ How can paradigms help/hinder our
work?
Second Question :
Third set of Questions :
-
Who are the stakeholders of our
organisation? How do we work with them?
How do we produce value for them?
-
Who/What influences our organisation the
most?
-
What is the image of our organisation in
the field of rural development? How
are we better than others?
-
What is our unique contribution to the
world around us? What is the impact
of our work?
-
How do we organise our finances?
-
What does our organisation look like in terms of
physical/organisational structure and communication patterns?
-
How do we share our good times with one
another? And how do we support one
another in bad times?
-
How have we ensured that our future is
safe?
-
What is the role of our organisation in
the community?
Fourth Question :
Fifth set of Questions :
-
What are the new things we need to
develop/do in our organisation (with regard
to systems, skills, attitudes, new directions, etc.)?
-
What resources are already available to us
and what resources do we need to
create/acquire in order to do the above?
-
What kind of people will constitute our
team? Where and how do we get these
people? Why would they want to be a part of us, i.e., what is the motivation for such people to join our team?
-
What kinds of things should we stop doing (that we are currently
doing)?
-
What the things that we need to know (that
we don't know at present)?
-
What are the positive elements in other
institutions that we can also adopt?
-
What five
core values should we build in
our organisation in order to carry us
forward to our vision?
The answers to the above questions were consolidated to yield a vision
for MYRADA by 2000 A.D. This has been
attached to this report.
Other major outputs were consolidated as follows :
A.
|
Strengths
of MYRADA
|
Weaknesses
of MYRADA
|
Threats
for MYRADA
|
|
Staff
:
Are committed, have vision clarity,
are innovative, are flexible,
are professional, are dynamic.
|
There
is some amount of staff turnover
and staff stagnation.
Training skills are adequate.
|
Good
staff may leave us. (turnover).
Insecurity among the Contract
staff. |
|
Mobility
is good (i.e. vehicles are
provided.
|
Documentation
skills are poor.
|
Collaboration
with Government is good,
but it also creates
several problems.
|
|
Infrastructure
facilities are good.
|
There
is under utilisation of training centres.
|
External
funding may diminish.
|
|
Approach
to issues is participatory
& bottom up.
|
Lack
of systematic follow-up (in
some areas).
|
|
|
Good
organising capacity.
|
Staff
are weak in communication
skills.
|
|
|
Positive
influence on other institutions.
|
There
is inadequate and irregular
impact analysis and evaluation.
|
|
|
Good
reputation
|
Personal
problems of staff are not
always addressed.
|
|
|
Quality
of work is good.
|
Staff
potential is not fully tapped.
|
|
|
Funding
status is good.
|
|
|
|
Working
with poor people.
|
Poor
maintenance of buildings and
equipment.
|
|
|
Working
with large numberof people
for better impact.
Networking is good. |
"Will
our efforts (eg. group building)
survive after we have
withdrawn?" this is a question
in the minds of the staff.
|
|
|
Open
to new ideas.
Organisation has self- confidence.
Organisation is working in difficult areas under dire
conditions. |
|
|
B.The core values to be fostered
in the organisation were listed as follows :
|
Team Work
Innovation
Tolerance
Accountability
Commitment
Hard work
Positive attitude
Trust
Respect
Spirit to learn
Participation in all matters
|
Out of this
list the following five were
listed as most essential :
TEAM WORK
COMMITMENT
SPIRIT TO LEARN
INNOVATION
TRUST
|
Plan of Action :
At the close of the workshop the participants decided that :
1. The `Vision' chart
would be enlarged and prominently displayed at each Project Office
so that staff could continuously reflect on the same and work towards achieving the vision.
2. Each participant group would repeat the workshop with the other
staff of theirrespective projects.
3. Each project would develop a plan of action that would help in
achieving the Vision.

|